In Wells Fargo Credit Corporation v.Martin,what was the result when a paralegal misread her instructions and bid lower on some foreclosed property than she was supposed to bid,and someone else bought the property at auction?
A) The paralegal was allowed to bid again for her company.
B) The paralegal was allowed to take title to the land only if she matched the bid of the highest bidder.
C) The person who made the highest bid, not the paralegal, was allowed to keep the land.
D) The auction was voided and conducted again because of the unilateral mistake of the paralegal.
E) The paralegal was allowed to bid again only because she presented proof by a disinterested witness of her unilateral mistake.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q80: When interpreting a contract with contradictory language,a
Q81: An integration clause is also known as
Q82: The doctrine of promissory estoppel is also
Q83: When a contract refers to an item
Q84: Which of the following is true?
A) Courts
Q86: Parol evidence may be admitted in court
Q87: Parol evidence may not be admitted in
Q88: Any oral or written words outside the
Q89: The parol evidence rule states that if
Q90: Treble damages is a possible remedy for:
A)
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents