In Krysa v.Paine,where Paine's Car Company was found to have committed fraud in the sale of a truck to Krysa,what did the court rule regarding the punitive damages award?
A) Punitive damages are not available in a fraud action based on a contract.
B) Punitive damages are limited to 9:1 in all cases.
C) Punitive damages are allowed at 9:1 in cases involving personal injury, but in contracts must adhere to a 3:1 ratio.
D) Punitive damages of 27:1 are permitted in cases of extreme fraud.
E) Punitive damages should never have a cap or their function as a deterrent and punishment would be lost.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q106: To prove that a person intended to
Q107: Fraud in the inception is also referred
Q108: Nondisclosure is a misrepresentation if it would
Q109: In a situation where one party to
Q110: The term "sceinter" means:
A) good faith
B) empty
Q112: When one party to a contract makes
Q113: In a situation where one party to
Q114: What is the significance of requiring that
Q115: What is the significance of requiring that
Q116: Andre has made a statement that the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents