Mini-Case "We've Got a Number of Important Issues to Discuss Today

Mini-Case
"We've got a number of important issues to discuss today," began Dee Stribyute as she opened the weekly marketing manager's meeting for Lite Bite Foods. Lite Bite is a producer of low fat, low calorie snack foods. The other managers attending the meeting were her two top assistants, Mark Etter and Rhea Taylor.
"First, sales were hurt last year when we had to recall our almond chocolate bars because of concerns about contaminated ingredients. We've got our work cut out for us to recover from that setback. Many stores quit carrying our products, and even the ones that continued to do so put less emphasis on displaying and promoting them. We've got to get our products into as many stores as possible. Consumers shouldn't have to go all over town trying to find our snacks. We also need to make sure that our products are displayed and promoted in a way that attracts attention." Dee looked at her assistants, and saw that they seemed ready to make some proposals. However, she decided to get another important issue out on the table before stopping to discuss solutions, so she continued with her comments. "The other big concern is the cost of moving our goods. Distribution costs are a major part of the overall cost of selling our goods. What can we do to make the flow of products from our kitchens to our ultimate consumers more efficient?" Having laid out her concerns, Dee sat down at the head of the table, saying to her assistants, "O.K. guys, I'm ready for suggestions."
-After listening to all of the challenges and issues, Rhea said she wanted to propose a more sweeping change. "Mark has already suggested doing some of the retailer's job for them. I say go even further-let's just do away with all of the intermediaries. We can perform all of their functions ourselves," she said. She went on to explain that, "Since we won't have to deal with intermediaries, my suggestion is bound to simplify the distribution process and cut costs dramatically." Rhea's suggestion:

A) is truly radical because it calls for the elimination of the entire supply chain.
B) is an example of an administered and contractual distribution system.
C) should be viewed with some skepticism, because it ignores the fact that intermediaries usually create enough value to justify their inclusion in the distribution process.
D) is not really very radical, since most manufacturing firms in recent years have used this approach to bring about dramatic reductions in their costs of distribution.