What was the result in Zuckerman v.Antenucci,involving the medical malpractice action in which the plaintiff sued both the attending doctor and his partner?
A) Only the doctor who actually provided treatment was liable for the judgment.
B) Both partners were jointly and severally liable for the judgment.
C) The partner who did not actually provide treatment was liable, but only to the extent of his capital contribution.
D) The doctor who actually provided treatment was liable for the judgment, and the plaintiff could recover partnership assets, but not the personal assets of the non-treating partner.
E) The non-treating partner was liable, but only because there was no agreement between the partners that the non-treating partner would be immune from liability.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q109: Which of the following is true about
Q110: A general partner who is offered an
Q111: Which of the following best describes who
Q112: Which of the following is true regarding
Q113: A limited partnership has two (2)types of
Q115: Where there is no agreement to share
Q116: When a new partner is admitted to
Q117: A limited partnership is required to have
Q118: Limited partnerships are also referred to as
Q119: Under the Uniform Partnership Act,general partners have
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents