Would it be better if proof of actual deception was required in order to prove a "false and deceptive" advertising claim under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act? Is it unfair to penalize advertisers when no actual deception can be shown?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of Would it be better if proof of actual deception was required in order to prove a "false and deceptive" advertising claim under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act? Is it unfair to penalize advertisers when no actual deception can be shown?

Would It Be Better If Proof of Actual Deception Was