What did the United States Supreme Court decide in National Labor Relations Board v.Exchange Parts Company,involving an employer who conferred new economic benefits on its employees just before a union election that the employer subsequently won?
A) The employer did not commit an unfair labor practice, because the employer only provided benefits, and did not make any threats.
B) The employer did not commit an unfair labor practice, because the employer did not expressly condition receipt of the benefits on voting against the union.
C) The employer did not commit an unfair labor practice, because the benefits were not significant enough to have effected the election.
D) The employer committed an unfair labor practice, and the United States Supreme Court ordered a new election.
E) The employer committed an unfair labor practice, but the National Labor Relations Act did not allow the United States Supreme Court to order a new election.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q129: Which of the following statutes allows the
Q130: Which of the following is a permissive
Q131: The National Labor Relations Act contains provisions
Q132: The National Labor Relations Board supervises which
Q133: Which of the following statutes provides employees
Q135: Which of the following statutes specifically covers
Q136: Which of the following states is not
Q137: "Vesting," as used in a pension plan,means:
A)
Q138: Collective bargaining subjects are classified under the
Q139: Under which of the following must an
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents