In 2003, 14-year-old Evan Miller beat his neighbor to death and burned down his trailer. Miller was convicted in 2006 and sentenced to life without the possibility of parole (LWOP) , which is the mandatory sentence for "murder in the course of arson." The Supreme Court found in the case bearing his name, Miller v. Alabama, that mandatory life sentences for juveniles were unconstitutional, although the court did not ban them outright. The court had already ruled against life sentences for juveniles in 2010. Why didn't this finding apply to the Miller case?
A) The 2010 finding was not applied retroactively, so it would not have impacted Miller because he was convicted in 2006.
B) The 2010 ruling rejected life sentences for nonhomicidal offenses.
C) The 2010 ruling was not applicable to Alabama.
D) The 2010 ruling was only applicable for juveniles that were not tried as adults.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q41: The primary sanction utilized by the juvenile
Q46: What was the key effect of the
Q49: Persons in need of supervision (PINS) would
Q53: Family dysfunction, substance abuse, and poor academic
Q54: The presumption of innocence is the hallmark
Q58: What is the burden-of-proof standard for juvenile
Q73: What has been the U.S. Supreme Court's
Q74: In Kent v. United States (1966), the
Q75: Between 2010 and 2012, there were many
Q76: Less than one third of cases referred
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents