Which law was intended to reduce crime and protect the public, but actually proved to be costly, unnecessarily punitive, and did not actually reduce crime?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Three-strikes law, also known as "habitual offender" laws, was intended to reduce crime by imposing longer sentences on repeat offenders. However, this law proved to be costly, unnecessarily punitive, and did not actually reduce crime. Studies have shown that the law did not deter crime or reduce recidivism, but instead led to overcrowding in prisons and higher costs for taxpayers. In addition, the law disproportionately affected communities of color and low-income individuals. Thus, numerous states have amended or repealed their Three-strikes laws in recent years.

Which Law Was Intended to Reduce Crime and Protect the Public