Which of the following correctly summarizes one of the differences in calculating marginal effects of probit/logit models relative to linear probability models?
A) Probit/logit models' marginal effects are causal; linear probability models are not.
B) Probit/logit models' marginal effects will not be constant for all values of X, while (strictly) linear probability models' marginal effects will be constant.
C) Probit/logit marginal effects cannot be positive since predictions need to be between zero and 1, while linear probability models can be positive.
D) Probit/logit marginal effects are stable, while linear probability models tend to be noisier.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q40: A marginal effect summarizes the:
A) change in
Q41: A potential shortcoming of the probit/logit models
Q42: After estimating a logit model for
Q43: When you estimate parameters by finding those
Q44: Estimating a probit or logit model via
Q45: For probit/logit models the size of the
Q46: A shortcoming of potentially using the probit/logit
Q47: Which of the following is a merit
Q49: A common method to estimate probit and
Q50: Aside from the sample being a random
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents