Which of the following is a difference between Fiedler's contingency theory of leadership and Robert House's path-goal theory?
A)Fred Fiedler's contingency theory states that leadership style should fit the needs of a situation,while Robert House's path-goal theory assumes that a leader's style is predominantly task oriented.
B)Fred Fiedler's contingency theory asserts that leaders cannot change their behaviour,while Robert House's path-goal theory assumes that leaders are flexible.
C)Fred Fiedler's contingency theory states that leadership styles are altered based on situations,while Robert House's path-goal theory reiterates that one leadership style suits all situations.
D)Fred Fiedler's contingency theory focuses on situational demands,while Robert House's path-goal theory identifies power structures that exist within an organization.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Fred Fiedler's contingency theory posits that a leader's effectiveness is contingent upon how well the leader's style matches the context, and it suggests that leaders cannot easily change their management style. On the other hand, Robert House's path-goal theory is based on the premise that leaders can and should adapt their style to the employee and task at hand to maximize productivity and satisfaction, indicating that leaders are indeed flexible in their approach.

Which of the Following Is a Difference Between Fiedler's Contingency