Which of the following is a way to challenge or attack a legal position or argument based on a court opinion?
A)The opinion is not on point because of key fact differences.
B)Reliance on the opinion is misplaced because the principle applied does not apply to the case at hand.
C)The court opinion is not subject to a different interpretation.
D)The court opinion is universally followed.
E)All of the above
F)Answers a and b above
G)Answers a,b,and d above

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Challenging a legal position based on a court opinion can be done by arguing that the opinion is not directly applicable due to significant factual differences (A) or by asserting that the principle it establishes does not apply to the current case (B). Options C and D do not represent ways to challenge a legal position.

Which of the Following Is a Way to Challenge or Attack