S,the accountant for a railway company,forged the signature of the company's signing officer on a company cheque.The cheque was payable on the company's account and made out to another company controlled by S.The agreement between the company and its bank had no provision requiring the company to verify the monthly statements sent it by the bank for any discrepancies.Eventually,the company discovered the forgery and demanded that the bank return the money to its account,but the bank refused.In a lawsuit by the company against the bank for recovery of its money
A) the bank will succeed because it simply honoured the cheques,which were negotiable instruments.
B) the bank will successfully defend the lawsuit because the cheques were forged by the company's accountant.
C) the company will succeed because there was no agreement between the bank and the company requiring the company to verify its statements.
D) the company will succeed but on a quantum meruit basis only.
E) the bank will succeed because the company owed the bank a duty to maintain internal audit controls,which would have found the problem.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: Delivery of a negotiable instrument in payment
A)is
Q15: Use the fact situation above to answer
Q16: Jack provides James with a cheque in
Q17: Albert,a supplier of goods,owes George $2000.00.Albert gives
Q18: Albert owes George a sum of money
Q20: The formal requirements of negotiable instruments include
Q21: A minor who makes a cheque payable
Q22: Only real defences can be used to
Q23: Presentment of a bill is necessary where
Q24: Joseph obtains a draft that states as
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents