Fundamental Value Based on Absolute PPP. Ideally, one would like to compare directly the price
of goods in two countries to see if an exchange rate conforms to absolute PPP, or whether it is overvalued or undervalued in real terms. As mentioned in Chapter 2, this can only be done for some individual goods that are clearly comparable ("law of one price"), and the estimation for different goods can lead to opposing conclusions. In Chapter 2, we provide an analysis based on the well-known Big Mac report of The Economist. Of course, the Big Mac is a very particular product and a fundamental PPP value can be computed on a wide range of products. The results are often conflicting. For example, one can look at production prices rather than consumption prices. Some studies are conducted by looking at labor costs. Rather than looking at unit labor costs for unskilled workers, as is often done, the exhibit below reports the average annual remuneration of the chief executive officer (CEO) of industrial companies with annual revenues of $250 million to $500 million in ten selected areas of the world. The figures are also from April 1998. They include all forms of compensation, such as bonuses, perks, and stock options, but are not adjusted for different taxes or costs of living.
The first column gives the total CEO compensation measured in U.S. dollars using the actual exchange rate, which is indicated in the second column. The third column gives the fundamental PPP value of each currency, implied by the national CEO compensations. It is the exchange rate with the dollar that would make CEO compensation identical in all countries. The fourth column gives the actual overvaluation (if positive) or undervaluation (if negative) of the local currency relative to its fundamental value in terms of CEO compensation.
EXHIBIT: Determining a Fundamental PPP Value Based on CEOs' Remuneration
Source: Total compensation data comes from Towers Perrin, 1998.
What conclusions can you draw from this exhibit?

Question

Fundamental Value Based on Absolute PPP. Ideally, one would like to compare directly the price
of goods in two countries to see if an exchange rate conforms to absolute PPP, or whether it is overvalued or undervalued in real terms. As mentioned in Chapter 2, this can only be done for some individual goods that are clearly comparable ("law of one price"), and the estimation for different goods can lead to opposing conclusions. In Chapter 2, we provide an analysis based on the well-known Big Mac report of The Economist. Of course, the Big Mac is a very particular product and a fundamental PPP value can be computed on a wide range of products. The results are often conflicting. For example, one can look at production prices rather than consumption prices. Some studies are conducted by looking at labor costs. Rather than looking at unit labor costs for unskilled workers, as is often done, the exhibit below reports the average annual remuneration of the chief executive officer (CEO) of industrial companies with annual revenues of $250 million to $500 million in ten selected areas of the world. The figures are also from April 1998. They include all forms of compensation, such as bonuses, perks, and stock options, but are not adjusted for different taxes or costs of living.
The first column gives the total CEO compensation measured in U.S. dollars using the actual exchange rate, which is indicated in the second column. The third column gives the fundamental PPP value of each currency, implied by the national CEO compensations. It is the exchange rate with the dollar that would make CEO compensation identical in all countries. The fourth column gives the actual overvaluation (if positive) or undervaluation (if negative) of the local currency relative to its fundamental value in terms of CEO compensation.
EXHIBIT: Determining a Fundamental PPP Value Based on CEOs' Remuneration
  Source: Total compensation data comes from Towers Perrin, 1998.
What conclusions can you draw from this exhibit?

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of Fundamental Value Based on Absolute PPP. Ideally, one would like to compare directly the price
of goods in two countries to see if an exchange rate conforms to absolute PPP, or whether it is overvalued or undervalued in real terms. As mentioned in Chapter 2, this can only be done for some individual goods that are clearly comparable ("law of one price"), and the estimation for different goods can lead to opposing conclusions. In Chapter 2, we provide an analysis based on the well-known Big Mac report of The Economist. Of course, the Big Mac is a very particular product and a fundamental PPP value can be computed on a wide range of products. The results are often conflicting. For example, one can look at production prices rather than consumption prices. Some studies are conducted by looking at labor costs. Rather than looking at unit labor costs for unskilled workers, as is often done, the exhibit below reports the average annual remuneration of the chief executive officer (CEO) of industrial companies with annual revenues of $250 million to $500 million in ten selected areas of the world. The figures are also from April 1998. They include all forms of compensation, such as bonuses, perks, and stock options, but are not adjusted for different taxes or costs of living.
The first column gives the total CEO compensation measured in U.S. dollars using the actual exchange rate, which is indicated in the second column. The third column gives the fundamental PPP value of each currency, implied by the national CEO compensations. It is the exchange rate with the dollar that would make CEO compensation identical in all countries. The fourth column gives the actual overvaluation (if positive) or undervaluation (if negative) of the local currency relative to its fundamental value in terms of CEO compensation.
EXHIBIT: Determining a Fundamental PPP Value Based on CEOs' Remuneration
  Source: Total compensation data comes from Towers Perrin, 1998.
What conclusions can you draw from this exhibit?