Both Keera and Vin worked full-time,although Keera's job was not a career.Keera has maintained primary custody of their two children.Since their divorce,which of these is most likely?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

As Keera's job was not a career, it is likely that she was earning less than Vin. Therefore, in a divorce settlement, Keera may not receive an equal share of their combined assets. Since Keera has maintained primary custody of their two children, she will have additional expenses related to childcare. These factors combined would result in Keera experiencing a decrease in standard of living after the divorce. Meanwhile, as Vin is still working full-time and does not have the added expenses of childcare, it is possible that his standard of living may increase slightly or remain the same after the divorce. A decrease of 36% for Keera and an increase of 28% for Vin seems like a reasonable estimate. Choices A, C, and D do not accurately represent the likely outcome of Keera and Vin's divorce based on the information provided.

Both Keera and Vin Worked Full-Time,although Keera's Job Was Not