Collectively,the U.S.Supreme Court cases Grutter v.Bollinger and Gratz v.Bollinger suggest that affirmation action
A) is likely permissible if it is narrowly tailored to fulfill a compelling state interest and does not rely on quotas.
B) is likely permissible as long as it is a points-based system and is otherwise colorblind.
C) is likely permissible as long as it reduces racial inequality and promotes cultural awareness or understanding.
D) may be unconstitutional if the goal is to promote diversity.
E) is typically unconstitutional.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q15: In which of the following areas was
Q16: The NAACP's greatest successes have come about
Q17: The U.S.Supreme Court upheld the right of
Q18: A literacy test as a requirement for
Q19: Which amendments to the U.S.Constitution were passed
Q21: In order to prevent blacks from having
Q22: Sit-ins and boycotts were used by the
Q23: People suffering from AIDS are covered under
Q24: Members of which of the following groups
Q25: In Brown v.Board of Education,the Supreme Court
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents