
Polly sold Jason a used car for $1,000.Their contract provided that the engine in the car was in good shape,a true statement as far as Polly knew.Unfortunately,the day after Jason purchased the car,it broke down and was discovered to have significant engine problems.Jason told Polly that he wanted a refund.Polly told him that he was not entitled to a refund because she did not lie and that as far as she knew,there was nothing wrong with the car.Which of the following is true?
A) Jason is entitled to a refund because of a breach of an express warranty.
B) Jason is entitled to a refund because of a breach of the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
C) Jason is entitled to a refund only if he can obtain evidence that Polly lied.
D) Jason is not entitled to a refund under any circumstances because the vehicle was used.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q38: UCC Section 2-319 expressly authorizes the buyer
Q38: Which of the following is the majority
Q39: When the seller provides the buyer with
Q41: In CASE 8.2 MacNeil Automotive Products,Ltd.v.Cannon Automotive,Ltd.(2010),MacNeil
Q42: Which of the following is an online
Q45: Ricardo develops a new type of software
Q47: Renee owns a small restaurant that sells
Q48: Which of the following will NOT create
Q51: In a state that had adopted the
Q53: Indicate how a seller may disclaim warranties
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents