Which of the following was the result in Pliva,Inc.v.Mensing,the case in the text before the U.S.Supreme Court involving the issue of whether the federal law requirement that generic drugs must bear the same FDA-approved labels as their brand-name counterparts preempts state law claims for failure to warn?
A) That federal law did not preempt state law claims for failure to warn.
B) That federal law preempted state law claims for failure to warn.
C) That federal law preempted state law claims for failure to warn based on strict liability but that failure to warn claims based on negligence could proceed.
D) That federal law preempted state law claims for failure to warn based on negligence but that failure to warn claims based on strict liability could proceed.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q45: Sally purchased a used toaster at a
Q45: Fact Pattern 10-1
Polly buys a new iron
Q46: Fact Pattern 10-1
Polly buys a new iron
Q51: Scuba manufacturer designs and sells the best
Q52: If the societal value of an inherently
Q57: ABC Company manufactures a contraption meant to
Q57: Which of the following members of the
Q60: Under what circumstances will a successor corporation
Q61: What are the four basic parts of
Q64: Paula recently went to see her doctor
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents