Which of the following was the result in Bilski v.Kappos,the case in the text involving whether a business process explaining how buyers and sellers of commodities in the energy market can use hedging to protect against price fluctuations is patentable?
A) The court ruled that the claimed invention was a patent-eligible process.
B) The court ruled that the claimed invention was not a patent-eligible process because it was an abstract idea.
C) The court ruled that the claimed invention was not a patent-eligible process because under federal patent law, no business methods may be the subject of patents.
D) The court ruled that more information was needed regarding expected profits before a determination could be made as to patentability.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: Which of the following is not a
Q26: A _ mark is a real word
Q27: Which of the following are defenses to
Q29: The practice of _ occurs when an
Q29: Under the _ use doctrine,under certain circumstances,a
Q29: What type of efficiency exists when competition
Q32: The federal trademark act is known as
Q33: What are the four basic types of
Q39: Which of the following is true regarding
Q51: The _ doctrine provides that copyright protection
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents