What Did the Court Rule in the Case in Which

What did the court rule in the case in which Holiday Inn claimed that by using a similar number a travel agency infringed Holiday Inns' trademark in its vanity toll-free telephone number?

A) That there was no potential for confusion and that, therefore, there was no trademark violation.
B) That there was a trademark violation and that damages were available.
C) That although there was a potential for confusion, there was no trademark violation.
D) That there was a trademark violation but that only injunctive relief was available.