Arguments often used against no-fault automobile insurance laws include all of the following EXCEPT
A)It is often difficult to determine which driver was negligent when a multiple-vehicle accident occurs.
B)Many injured persons will not be compensated for their full losses because payments for pain and suffering will be eliminated.
C)The defects of the negligence system are exaggerated,and the system needs only to be reformed.
D)Claims of efficiency and premium saving are exaggerated,and automobile insurance premiums might actually increase.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Option A is incorrect because it describes a scenario that supports the use of no-fault insurance, which is designed to eliminate the need to determine fault in an accident.

Arguments Often Used Against No-Fault Automobile Insurance Laws Include All