In Ruffin v.Entertainment of the Eastern Panhandle,the plaintiff was found:
A) not an employee for FLSA purposes.
B) an employee for FLSA purposes.
C) an independent contractor for FLSA purposes.
D) None of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: The Davis-Bacon Act provides that contractors working
Q19: As on July 24,2009 the minimum wages
Q21: The Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 extended
Q21: Minors aged sixteen to eighteen may work
Q22: If a worker is one who receives
Q24: Which of the following is not a
Q35: The government attempted to reduce poverty and
Q39: Mathew is an outside salesperson employed by
Q41: Describe the coverage of the FLSA.
Q58: How did the NIRA come into effect?
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents