In Sorrell v.IMS Health Inc.,the Supreme Court reviewed a state law prohibiting the sale of doctors' prescription records (tracking consumer trends)to marketing and data-mining firms.The Court agreed that the regulation targeted economic activity and infringed on commercial speech.The majority applied strict scrutiny to strike down the regulation as an unconstitutional content-based and viewpoint based regulation.Discuss the reasoning of the dissent to explain why this ruling is significant and how it changes the commercial speech doctrine.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q38: In Sorrell v IMS Health Inc.,the Supreme
Q39: The Lanham Act originally targeted unfair competition
Q40: Which of the following is not part
Q41: The government has nearly absolute power to
Q42: A single federal agency and a uniform
Q44: Recent Supreme Court decisions appear to be
Q45: The Supreme Court has ruled that a
Q46: Under what condition does the commercial speech
Q47: The Federal Communication Commission regulates offensive broadcast
Q48: State the two categories of measures available
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents