In the 2015 trial in Boston of the Boston Marathon bombing suspect,some 70% of potential jurors reported a personal connection to the trial,yet the trial judge repeatedly denied defense requests to change the venue of the trial.On appeal,the federal circuit court upheld the lower court's decision that intense media attention "does not equate to disqualifying prejudice." Trial judges have discretion over whether to grant changes of venue and rely on the Supreme Court's decisions in Estes v.Texas and Shepard v.Maxwell to decide questions about prejudicial media publicity.Discuss the guidance of these two Supreme Court rulings and reach your own decision about the judge's proper course of action.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q48: Jury sequestration is the most frequent method
Q49: To meet the legal requirement of impartiality,a
Q50: Grand jury sessions are presumptively open to
Q51: Judges generally may close all or portions
Q52: The Sixth Amendment guarantees criminal defendants the
Q54: Describe three different harms to a fair
Q55: Explain the legal foundations for a public
Q56: Courts rely on the experience and logic
Q57: According to the Supreme Court's decision in
Q58: In Press-Enterprise II v.Superior Court,the Supreme Court
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents