The U.S.Supreme Court struck down the anti-hate ordinance at issue in R.A.V.v.St.Paul in part because the law was underinclusive.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court stated in its ruling that the ordinance was underinclusive because it only prohibited certain types of hateful speech (such as those based on race, religion, and gender), but did not prohibit others (such as those based on political affiliation or sexual orientation).

The USSupreme Court Struck Down the Anti-Hate Ordinance at Issue in in R.A.V.v.St.Paul