In New York Times v.United States,the Supreme Court said that
A) government bears an extremely heavy burden of proof to justify prior restraints
B) prior restraints are constitutional when speech tends to harm important government interests
C) prior restraints are constitutional when speech poses a clear and present danger to a government interest of the highest order
D) both A and B
E) both A and C
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Content-neutral regulations are also called
A)time,place,and manner regulations
B)majoritarian
Q2: The Supreme Court has said that,under the
Q3: In Near v.Minnesota,the Supreme Court ruled that
A)prior
Q5: In First Amendment jurisprudence,original intent means the
A)perceived
Q6: Prior review
A)is part of the final editing
Q7: The First Amendment prohibits abridgements of the
Q8: The Supreme Court generally interprets freedom of
Q9: Laws that indirectly limit the freedom of
Q10: When the Supreme Court reviews the constitutionality
Q11: Instrumentalists argue that the First Amendment advances
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents