Economic analysis of the optimal amount of pollution is typically done in terms of the amount of pollution
Abated, as opposed to the amount of pollution produced. Why?
A) Because it is more practical to measure the marginal costs of pollution abated than of pollution produced.
B) Because governments and environmental authorities can produce more reliable data on pollution abated than pollution produced, which facilitates the economic analysis.
C) Because the abatement of pollution is a ʺgoodʺ to which we can more easily apply the concepts of supply and demand.
D) Because there are no marginal benefits of pollution produced, so it is necessary to study pollution abated in order to equate marginal benefits and marginal costs.
E) All of the above are correct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: The socially optimal level of output of
Q23: What is the "marginal cost of pollution
Q24: When the marginal costs of pollution abatement
Q27: When considering an entire industry,the marginal benefit
Q29: Suppose a firm producing roof shingles imposes
Q29: The optimal amount of pollution abatement is
Q36: In general,the economist's view on allocating resources
Q37: Suppose a local meat packing company dumps
Q39: If the government wants to ensure that
Q40: The marginal benefit of reducing pollution in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents