Questions below will be based on the following: A researcher was interested in discovering whether attitude changes can be more effectively brought about when persons are made to feel part of the decision making process. A group of women was selected and randomly assigned to one of two groups, one group being placed in a large lecture hall, and the other in a small discussion-group setting. In the lecture setting, a speaker exhorted the women to use less expensive cuts of meat, whereas in the small-group setting a different group leader, although raising the same issues as the lecture had, also encouraged the subjects to participate in the discussion and offer suggestions, Several weeks later both groups of women were checked at home to determine whether they were indeed using the meat cuts which had been urged. Only 3% of the lecture group members had the meat cuts, whereas 32% of the discussion group members had the meat cuts. The difference was clearly significant.
-The fact that the two groups differed significantly regarding whether or not they had the meat cuts, means that
A) Ho was accepted
B) Ho was never tested
C) Ho was rejected
D) the dependent variable was not affected
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q107: One of the fundamental requirements of all
Q108: The problem of pre-test sensitization is most
Q109: When doing experimental research, if the sample
Q110: The safest way to avoid the cause-and-effect
Q111: When the design of an experiment is
Q113: When the results of a rat study
Q114: In evaluating the results of experimental research,
Q115: When the design of an experiment simulates
Q116: When a significant difference is found between
Q117: Any time a variable has been controlled,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents