McKenzie purchases goods from Dormond. Later McKenzie goes to court and the court declares that the contract between McKenzie and Dormand is void. This means that
A) McKenzie can keep the goods and demand his money back from Dormond.
B) The court has declared that there was a valid contract between Dormond and McKenzie from the date of the purchase, until the date of the Court ruling.
C) Dormond has to return all money received from McKenzie, but McKenzie does not have to return the goods.
D) The court has declared that Dormond breached the contract.
E) McKensie can return all or the remainder of the goods to Dormond in exchange for reimbursement of payment.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A mistake in contract law that leads
Q2: A pleas of non est factum
A) means
Q3: A mistake in contract law can lead
Q5: Cal contracts to sell 1,000 logs to
Q6: In a legal sense, mistake is
A) an
Q7: Joe buys two tickets for a baseball
Q8: Mistake about terms DOES NOT include
A) the
Q9: Rectification will be ordered where
A) the parties
Q10: When a court declares a contract to
Q11: Where a party claims that an agreement
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents