The Supreme Court has used case law to define the boundaries of the Miranda warning since this landmark decision was handed down.Which is inaccurate pertaining to these boundaries?
A) Suspects must be fully aware of all the possible outcomes of waiving their rights for the Miranda warning to be considered properly given.
B) Admissible evidence can be obtained without a Miranda warning if the information sought is needed to protect public safety.
C) At trial,the testimony of a witness is permissible even if her or his identity was revealed by the defendant in violation of the Miranda rule.
D) Once a criminal suspect has invoked his or her Miranda rights,police officials cannot reinitiate interrogation in the absence of counsel.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: When an officer does not have probable
Q23: Which of the following is not among
Q27: What is known about adding more police
Q30: Recent court rulings pertaining to Miranda warnings
Q31: The investigation of crimes occurs in a
Q32: Assigning officers to a particular area to
Q32: Which form of indigent defense involves a
Q45: The typical state court structure includes lower
Q50: Which of the following components is not
Q55: Which of the following is not a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents