Danny obtains a warrant to search a local warehouse for "any evidence of illegal activity." He discovers some marijuana in an employee's locker.At trial,the employee challenges the seizure on the grounds that it was unconstitutional.Is it?
A) No,because Danny had a valid warrant,signed by the judge.
B) No,because the warrant stated that Danny could search for evidence of illegal activity.
C) Yes,because the warrant was too vague.
D) Yes,because there was no proof that Danny knew the identity of the employee.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: A search warrant can become "stale" and
Q7: Another way of charging a person is
Q8: Police stake out Carl's house because they
Q9: At trial,the prosecution is represented by the
Q10: When an appellate court orders a new
Q12: A person can plead the Fifth Amendment
Q13: All of the following are exceptions to
Q14: The prosecutor is employed in the same
Q15: All of the following are considered to
Q16: Shortly after his or her arrest,a suspect
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents