During closing arguments,the attorney can argue unreasonable or illogical conclusions about what the evidence shows.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

During closing arguments, attorneys have some latitude to argue their own interpretation of the evidence presented to the jury, even if it may seem unreasonable or illogical to others. This is part of their advocacy for their client's case. However, they are also bound by ethical rules and cannot misrepresent the evidence or knowingly make false statements.

During Closing Arguments,the Attorney Can Argue Unreasonable or Illogical Conclusions