The U.S. District Court, in Julea Ward vs. Eastern Michigan University, ruled that:
A) the university was justified in dismissing the student for violating provisions of the code of ethics that prohibit discrimination based on race, religion, national origin, age, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, disability, marital status/partnership, language preference, or socioeconomic status.
B) the university was justified to enforce standards expected of students in a counseling program, even when a student objects on religious grounds.
C) the university was not justified in dismissing the student for violating provisions of the code of ethics that prohibit discrimination based on race, religion, national origin, age, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, disability, marital status/partnership, language preference, or socioeconomic status.
D) the university was not justified to enforce standards expected of students in a counseling program, even when______________________a student objects on religious grounds.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of The U.S. District Court, in Julea Ward vs. Eastern Michigan University, ruled that:
A) the university was justified in dismissing the student for violating provisions of the code of ethics that prohibit discrimination based on race, religion, national origin, age, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, disability, marital status/partnership, language preference, or socioeconomic status.
B) the university was justified to enforce standards expected of students in a counseling program, even when a student objects on religious grounds.
C) the university was not justified in dismissing the student for violating provisions of the code of ethics that prohibit discrimination based on race, religion, national origin, age, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, disability, marital status/partnership, language preference, or socioeconomic status.
D) the university was not justified to enforce standards expected of students in a counseling program, even when______________________a student objects on religious grounds.

The US District Court, in Julea Ward Vs