Morgan entered into a long-term contract at age 17. In the state in which the contract was executed, the majority age was 18. She is now 19 and would like to disaffirm the contract on the grounds that she was a minor when she entered into the contract. Which of the following statements is true?
A) Morgan can disaffirm the contract because she lacked competency at the time she entered into the contract, thus rendering the contract voidable.
B) Morgan can disaffirm the contract because the contract is void.
C) Morgan cannot disaffirm the contract because there was ample consideration.
D) Morgan cannot disaffirm the contract because she ratified it by failing to disaffirm the contract in a timely fashion.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q52: Which of the following statements is true
Q53: Which of the following contracts would be
Q54: A liquidated debt exists when there is
Q55: Fraud is one of the factors that
Q56: The doctrine of promissory estoppel requires a
Q58: James works for the county fire department
Q59: is defined as a bargained-for exchange of
Q60: Roberto has an art collection valued at
Q61: In the case of necessaries, the intoxicated
Q62: Leases for longer than usually have to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents