Which of the following refers to a defense to negligence that consists of proving that the plaintiff did not exercise the ordinary degree of care to protect against an unreasonable risk of harm and that this failure directly results in causing the plaintiff's harm?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The defense referred to in the question is contributory negligence, which asserts that the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to their harm and therefore they cannot recover damages. Negligence per se is a doctrine that establishes that a defendant had a duty to the plaintiff by violating a statute or regulation, and therefore negligence is presumed. Comparative negligence is a system that allows recovery of damages based on the percentage of fault of each party, rather than an all-or-nothing approach like contributory negligence. Res ipsa loquitur is a doctrine that allows the plaintiff to shift the burden of proof to the defendant by showing that the harm could not have happened without negligence on the defendant's part.

Which of the Following Refers to a Defense to Negligence