The Supreme Court in District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v.Osborne (2009) involved prisoner Osborne's postconviction request to compel officials to release biological evidence so it could be submitted to DNA testing.What was the finding of the Court?
A) Osborne has a right under the U.S.Constitution of access to forensic evidence
B) Osborne's rights under Alaska law were violated
C) there is no right under the U.S.Constitution of access to forensic evidence
D) DNA testing is too expensive to make it a constitutional right
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: According to the Supreme Court,show-ups are:
A)so suggestive
Q24: Research indicates that most eye witnesses to
Q24: Eyewitness identification of strangers is low in
Q26: What did the court decide with regards
Q27: According to the Supreme Court opinion in
Q27: Many legal commentators suggest that one way
Q29: Which of the following is NOT one
Q30: In order to exclude identification evidence on
Q31: Identifying perpetrators is easier than proving that
Q32: Psychological research shows that when the person
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents