In the case of Wilson v Arkansas (1995) ,what did the court decide?
A) The police can never enter a home to execute a warrant without knocking first.
B) Searches of automobiles did not require probable cause because of the "mobility factor."
C) Officers can only "pat" someone down,and the pat-down can only be for weapons.
D) The issue of allowing police to enter without knocking was reasonable but the state courts were remanded to determine reasonableness for the use of a "no-knock" entry.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: According to the Supreme Court in New
Q17: Under the holding in Chimel v.California (1969),a
Q18: Concerning pretext searches:
A)the Supreme Court has decided
Q19: The following are all examples of emergency
Q20: The countervailing law enforcement interests against "noknock"
Q23: In Arizona v.Gant (2009),the Supreme Court ruled:
A)when
Q25: Police officers at the scene of a
Q26: What do the police need to articulate
Q32: Concerning third-party consent to search, in which
Q40: The scope of a search incident to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents