In Maryland v.Wilson,the case where police removed and detained a passenger from a lawfully stopped vehicle,the Supreme Court held:
A) that the officer's ordering the passenger out of the car was an unreasonable seizure.
B) that the practice of ordering all drivers and passengers stopped in traffic stops out of their vehicles as a matter of course was reasonable.
C) that the officer's ordering him out of the car was too great an intrusion into the driver's liberty.
D) that they must have articulable suspicion of danger to order the passenger out of the vehicle.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: Categorical suspicion:
A)can be sufficient in itself
Q25: The case of Michigan v.Sitz (1990)challenged the
Q26: Frisks:
A)are the most invasive type of search.
B)are
Q27: According to the Supreme Court in U.S.v.Montoya
Q28: Since stops and frisks take place in
Q30: Stop and frisks impact a greater number
Q30: Outer clothing pat-downs do not constitute Fourth
Q32: Stops and frisks are more invasive than
Q33: According to Michigan v.Sitz (1990),do DWI roadblocks
Q34: According to the Supreme Court opinion in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents