According to the Supreme Court in Michigan v.Sitz,involving sobriety checkpoints,detaining a car briefly at a sobriety check point:
A) is not a stop.
B) is a stop,but it is not covered by the Fourth Amendment.
C) is a stop to which the Fourth Amendment applies.
D) requires probable cause to think that someone in the car has committed a crime.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: Reasonable suspicion needed to make a stop:
A)requires
Q17: Until the 1960s,the U.S.Supreme Court followed the_,which
Q18: The balancing approach to reasonableness:
A)requires courts to
Q19: The objective basis for stops and frisks
Q20: Which of the following activities can NOT
Q21: Categorical suspicion:
A)can be sufficient in itself
Q22: If an officer was specifically patting down
Q23: According to the Supreme Court in Michigan
Q25: The case of Michigan v.Sitz (1990)challenged the
Q26: Frisks:
A)are the most invasive type of search.
B)are
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents