In which case did the court rule that a person's right to privacy outweighed their location? That is,the person's expectation of privacy as opposed to the place that would have an expectation of privacy?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Katz v U.S., the court ruled that a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy in a public phone booth and that the government violated the Fourth Amendment by using a wiretap to listen in on the conversation. This case established the principle that individuals have a right to privacy that is not determined solely by their physical location, but by their expectation of privacy in a certain place or situation.

In Which Case Did the Court Rule That a Person's