In U.S.v.White,involving incriminating statements heard by law enforcement because of warrantless electronic eavesdropping of defendant White's coconspirator,the Supreme Court held that:

Question

In U.S.v.White,involving incriminating statements heard by law enforcement because of warrantless electronic eavesdropping of defendant White's co­conspirator,the Supreme Court held that:

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court held that White had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his conversation with the co-conspirator, therefore the warrantless electronic eavesdropping did not violate the Fourth Amendment. The court reasoned that since White knew he was communicating with a co-conspirator, he should have expected that the conversation could be overheard and used against him in court.

In USVWhite,involving Incriminating Statements Heard by Law Enforcement Because of Warrantless