In California v.Hodari D.(1991) ,the Supreme Court ruled:
A) a seizure cannot occur if the suspect does not yield.
B) a show of authority stop by police is sufficient to establish a seizure occurred.
C) a show of authority is sufficient to establish that a suspect is not free to leave.
D) a warning shot is required to establish a seizure occurred and the suspect continues to flee.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: According to the privacy doctrine, the Fourth
Q27: The discovery of evidence by means of
Q29: In practice, searches and seizures sometimes serve
Q30: In California v.Hodari D.(1991),a juvenile dropped the
Q32: The point at which an actual seizure
Q37: The US.Supreme Court has held that citizens
Q38: The twopronged test of privacy to determine
Q39: The Fourth Amendment only protects against invasions
Q39: The Fourth Amendment does not protect what
Q40: According to the plurality opinion of the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents