In Kyllo v.United States (2001) ,the Court held that using a technological device to explore the details of a home that would previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion is a search and is presumptively unreasonable without:
A) reasonable suspicion.
B) a probable cause.
C) a warrant.
D) exigent circumstances.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: In order to meet the requirements of
Q17: Which of the following is NOT generally
Q18: Three basic requirements of the plain view
Q19: Which of the following is a Fourth
Q20: Which of the following is least likely
Q22: Which doctrine states items that are within
Q23: If an officer touches something that is
Q24: In Florida v.Riley (1989),the Court said that
Q25: Which of the following issues has NOT
Q26: Which of the following would NOT indicate
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents