In Illinois v.Lidster (2004),the U.S.Supreme Court stated that the Fourth Amendment treats a motorist's car as his castle.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Illinois v. Lidster, the Supreme Court did not state that the Fourth Amendment treats a motorist's car as his castle. The "car as castle" concept is more closely associated with other legal principles and cases concerning the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, but it was not the focus of the Illinois v. Lidster decision, which dealt with the constitutionality of police roadblocks for information gathering about a crime.

In Illinois V