In United States v.Arvizu (534 U.S.266 [2001]),the Court held that a reasonable suspicion determination in automobile stop cases is based on the totality of the circumstances rather than each act viewed separately.What do you think is the reasoning for the totality of the circumstances requirement?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q102: Roadblocks because of a hit-and-run accident are
Q103: In Carroll v.United States (1925),the Supreme Court
Q104: Warrantless searches of motor vehicles after a
Q105: A vehicle stop is a form of
Q106: What types of checkpoints or roadblocks have
Q108: The U.S.Supreme Court has held that although
Q109: Inventory searches of vehicles are valid,but must
Q110: In Robbins v.California (1981),the U.S.Supreme Court stated
Q111: Warrantless searches of motor vehicles after a
Q112: In certain types of checkpoints and roadblocks,no
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents