There is no search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment if police use drug-detection dogs,as long as the police:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The use of drug-detection dogs by police does not constitute a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment as long as the police are legally present at the location where they use the dog. This principle was established in cases such as Illinois v. Caballes, where the Supreme Court ruled that a dog sniff conducted during a lawful traffic stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches. The key factor is the legality of the police's presence, not the presence of a warrant, reasonable suspicion, or the training of the dog.

There Is No Search Within the Meaning of the Fourth