In Illinois v.Wardlow (2000),the U.S.Supreme Court held that presence in a high-crime area,combined with unprovoked flight upon observing police officers,gives officers sufficient grounds to investigate to further determine__________if criminal activity is about to take place.What remains unclear about the Wardlow rule? Do you agree or disagree with the majority in Wardlow? Explain your position.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of In Illinois v.Wardlow (2000),the U.S.Supreme Court held that presence in a high-crime area,combined with unprovoked flight upon observing police officers,gives officers sufficient grounds to investigate to further determine__________if criminal activity is about to take place.What remains unclear about the Wardlow rule? Do you agree or disagree with the majority in Wardlow? Explain your position.

In Illinois V