In Minnesota v.Dickerson,the search would probably have been considered valid if the officer had testified that,although what he touched did not feel like a weapon,it was immediately apparent to him,given his experience and the totality of circumstances,that the object was contraband.Do you think that this encourages officers to be deceitful? Explain your position.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of In Minnesota v.Dickerson,the search would probably have been considered valid if the officer had testified that,although what he touched did not feel like a weapon,it was immediately apparent to him,given his experience and the totality of circumstances,that the object was contraband.Do you think that this encourages officers to be deceitful? Explain your position.

In Minnesota V