The Supreme Court in Terry v.Ohio (1968)set guidelines,in sequence,for both a stop and a frisk.If a police officer goes beyond the guidelines for the frisk,and reaches his hand into a suspect's coat pocket and pulls out a baggie containing a white powdery substance,that lab results identify as cocaine,will the prosecution be able to use the cocaine? Why or why not? What could the officer have done differently?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q98: The Supreme Court uses a case-by-case approach
Q99: After making a valid stop of a
Q100: The Supreme Court has ruled that stopping
Q101: A frisk should automatically follow a stop.
Q102: Explain why the Fourth Amendment applies to
Q104: The plain touch doctrine requires that the
Q105: In Illinois v.Wardlow (2000),the U.S.Supreme Court held
Q106: Define,compare,and contrast a stop with an arrest.Provide
Q107: To what extent is stop and frisk
Q108: In Minnesota v.Dickerson,the search would probably have
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents