For this evidence to be admissible and not a violation of the exclusionary rule,
A) no search warrant is needed,because of the principle of inevitable discovery.
B) no search warrant is needed,because it is independent source.
C) a search warrant would have been needed.
D) no search warrant is needed,because the actions occurring in the apartment were illegal.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q42: Prior to Weeks v.United States,what would have
Q43: If the garage was at 421 Main
Q44: The exclusionary rule provides that any evidence
Q45: The_ taint doctrine is an exception to
Q46: One alternative to the exclusionary rule is
Q48: If a neighbor had conducted the search
Q49: The exclusionary rule functions primarily as a
Q50: What would be the result today in
Q51: If the officers had a search warrant,but
Q52: If the officers obtained verbal consent,but the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents