The Supreme Court has ruled that trustworthy statements obtained in violation of the Miranda rule may be used:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court has ruled that while statements obtained in violation of Miranda cannot be used as direct evidence against a defendant, they can be used to impeach the credibility of a witness who takes the stand. This means that if a defendant testifies and gives a different statement than what they gave during an interrogation in violation of Miranda, the prosecutor can use that statement to show that the defendant is not credible.

The Supreme Court Has Ruled That Trustworthy Statements Obtained in Violation